Compiled by Ida Erasmus
Industrial Nutritionist
Nutrition Society #661
Windhoek
Namibia
03 April 2013
So says
ardent; “anti-sugarman”, Dr. Robert Lustig
Dr. Robert Lustig who, in this
article, explains his latest published research on sugar’s role in global
diabetes.
A calorie is a measurement of energy
(a matter of physics), not a value judgment on where that energy goes (a matter
of biochemistry). As his book Fat Chance explains,
you get sick from inappropriate energy storage (in your liver and muscle), not
defective energy balance (bigger love handles).
Nonetheless, “a calorie is a calorie” continues to be
promulgated by the food industry as their defense against their culpability for
the current epidemic of obesity and chronic metabolic disease. But it is as dishonest as a three dollar
bill. Here are just four examples that
refute this dogma:
1. Fibre
You eat 160 calories in almonds, but you absorb only
130. The fibre in the almonds delays
absorption of calories into the bloodstream, delivering those calories to the
bacteria in your intestine, which chew them up.
Because a calorie is not a calorie.
2. Protein
When it comes to food, you have to put energy in to get
energy out. You have to put twice as
much energy in to metabolize protein as you do carbohydrate, this is called
thermic effect of food. So protein
wastes more energy in its processing.
Plus protein reduces hunger better than carbohydrate. Because a calorie is not a calorie.
3. Fat
All fats release nine calories per gram when burned. But omega-3 fats are heart-healthy and will
save your life, while trans fats,
clog your arteries, leading to a heart attack. Because a calorie is not a calorie.
4. Sugar
This is the “big kahuna” of the “big lie”. Sugar is not one chemical, it’s two. Glucose is the energy of life. Every cell in every organism on the planet
can burn glucose for energy. Glucose is
mildly sweet, but not very interesting (think molasses). Fructose is an entirely different
animal. Fructose is very sweet, the
molecule we seek. Both burn at four
calories per gram. If fructose were just
like glucose, then sugar or hig-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) would be just like
starch. But fructose is not
glucose. Because a calorie is not a
calorie.
Up until now, scientists have shown that sugar is
“associated” or “correlated” with various chronic metabolic diseases. For instance, the increase in sugar
consumption over the past 30 years paralleled the increase in obesity, diabetes
and heart disease. Areas that drink more
soda ( eg., the American Southeast) experience higher prevalence of these
diseases. But correlation is not
causation.
Which direction do the data go? Does sugar cause obesity and metabolic
disease? Or do obese people with
metabolic disease drink soda? You can’t
tell, because you only have one point in time – the snapshot, not the
movie.
Bottom line – only changes in sugar availability
explained changes in diabetes prevalence worldwide, nothing else mattered …….